|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Our Firm has achieved another trial success in Laurel, Mississippi, located in Jones County, which historically has been recognized as a "Judicial Hellhole." In Strong, et al v. DuPont, et al, we represented DuPont in a three (3) week trial before a jury and Judge Billy Joe Landrum. The case involved alleged exposure of dioxin and heavy metals to Glen Strong as a result of production processes at DuPont's DeLisle, Mississippi, facility. The Strongs claimed that dioxin and metal exposure combined to cause his cancer, multiple myeloma. Debbie Kuchler and Monique Weiner of our Firm co-tried the case and were supported principally by another partner/shareholder, Charles Abbott. In his closing argument, Allen Stewart (formerly of Baron & Budd in Dallas, Texas) asked the jury to award between $15 to $20 million for Mr. Strong and an additional $3 to $4 million for his wife. Following its deliberation, the jury returned a unanimous defense verdict (12-0) for DuPont. DuPont's primary trial theme, which apparently resonated with the jury, was that there is not credible, competent, scientific support to link multiple myeloma with exposure to dioxins and heavy metals. This theme was supported by the expert testimony of Dr. Phil Cole, epidemiologist, and Dr. Tate Thigpen, oncologist. Although the case was scientific in focus, Abbott, Simses' approach was to present and summarize the evidence in a common sense way, to empower the jury to reach their own conclusion, rather than belittle them with demeaning explanations. Debbie, Monique, Charles and the team did an excellent job. Our client, DuPont, was extremely pleased with their efforts and results. CNN, Bloomberg News and The Wall Street Journal covered the defense verdict. This unanimous defense verdict in the Strong case follows last year's defense verdict in Jones County in the Ladner matter. In that case, the Ladners sought wrongful death damages for the loss of their 9-year old daughter to hepatoblastoma. The jury there found that the child's illness was not caused by the emissions from the DuPont DeLisle plant. |
![]() |
||||
|
|
|||||